T P O

T   P   O
The Patient Ox (aka Hénock Gugsa)

G r e e t i n g s !

** TPO **
A personal blog with diverse topicality and multiple interests!


On the menu ... politics, music, poetry, and other good stuff.
There is humor, but there is blunt seriousness here as well!


Parfois, on parle français ici aussi. Je suis un francophile .... Bienvenue à tous!

* Your comments and evaluations are appreciated ! *

Saturday, October 30, 2021

"Afajeshigne !" አ ፋ ጀ ሽ ኝ ! ~ by Michael Belayneh

 

Sayat Demmissie - Ethiopian actress

Afajeshigne ! - አ ፋ ጀ ሽ ኝ !
[ You have me embattled ! ]
~ by Michael Belayneh ~
🤔 🙂 👍 🌟 

 

Friday, October 29, 2021

In Autumn - by Rosemary Danielis (on tumblr.com)

 

- In Autumn - 

by Rosemary Danielis (on tumblr.com) 

In Autumn
the leaves have
a sparkle all
their own

✨🍁✨



Thursday, October 28, 2021

Conformisim ! ~ by Hénock Gugsa

 

Hénock Gugsa in Duluth, MN

Conformism ! ~ by Hénock Gugsa 

~~~ // ~~~

     Conformism is a very hard pill to swallow.  I remember once I almost could have gotten into hot water at my last job.  An administrative assistant to the CEO sent out a company-wide heads-up memo about the latest advertisement drive for our organization (which was an HMO).  She was bragging about how innovative and smart our latest ad was.  One of the venues they were using was billboards on major highways and expressways in the Twin Cities. 

     This particular ad was supposed to be unique because the name of the HMO was written upside down.  So in effect, a motorist going at 75 or 80 mph was expected to twist his head upside-down to be able to read the name.  So I got my digital camera and drove by one location with highway overpasses and exit ramps, etc., which had one of these billboards with our ad on it.  I took a snapshot and sent it as an attachment in a response email to the lady's communique.  I also expressed my opinion on what a bad idea it all was.  I actually pointed out that as a "health and well-being concern", we should not be creating a hazardous and ineffective distraction in our cities' highways.  

     I thought I was doing a proactive thing with my response.  But my immediate supervisors, whom I had copied in my missive, just went nervous and almost catatonic saying to me that I could be getting a serious reprimand or something.  Well, I did not hear anything from  the CEO's office for about a week.  And then I got a lukewarm response where they essentially stood firm on their Management decision.  They even went a step further and poured praise on the vendor saying that it was a prize-winning and acclaimed company.  

     And so ended the drama!

Post script -- Whatever the driving force, I don't think I would have gone thru with such an impulsive reaction had I slept on it for two, or three nights. I should have remembered that in many situations, 'discretion is the better part of valor'! 🤔 😉 

 

Wednesday, October 27, 2021

A Strange New Trend ~ by Alison Green

 

  A Strange New Trend ~ by  Alison Green *

()()()()()()() 

Few people are as knee-deep in our work-related anxieties and sticky office politics as Alison Green, who has been fielding workplace questions for a decade now on her website Ask a Manager. In Direct Report, she spotlights themes from her inbox that help explain the modern workplace and how we could be navigating it better.  

In today’s topsy-turvy job market, a strange new thing is happening. Employers are increasingly grumbling about job seekers “ghosting” them. These job candidates just don’t show up for their scheduled interviews. And in some cases, new hires accept a job only to disappear.  

Here’s some of what I’ve heard from managers:

    I’m in the medical field and this is happening to us to for the past year 6–12 months. Being ghosted for interviews, people not responding. Five people scheduled to interview, but one shows up. We’ve even hired people who didn’t show up in the first day or didn’t return for the second. Nurses and front office positions. It’s unreal.

    I went from working at a nonprofit to working for a vendor. … Part of my job is hiring, but I’m having a much harder time hiring now than I did at the nonprofit. The pay and benefits are better—we start people at more than the max rate at the nonprofit, hours are more consistent, and we offer good PTO, matching 401k, and insurance. I’ve sent out over 30 offers to interview. Nine agreed to interviews. Three didn’t show up, two failed background checks, two didn’t want to travel … and we’ve made offers to the other two but neither has responded to accept or reject. I’ve never had so many people just not respond or not show up. Is this the new normal? … I’m at a loss and feeling really discouraged.

    I’m hiring for multiple hourly entry-level manufacturing jobs, well above local minimum wage with PTO, benefits, etc. If I reach out for a brief phone interview, only 50 percent respond. If I set up the interview, it’s no longer shocking when someone doesn’t answer the phone. … THEN once I offer a job … nothing. No response. I don’t get it.

Employers, unsurprisingly, do not like this. It’s rude, they say, and unprofessional. And sure, it is. But employers have been doing this to workers for years, and their hand-wringing didn’t start until the tables were turned.

For years I’ve fielded questions from job seekers frustrated at being ghosted by job interviewers. They would take time off from work, maybe buy a new suit, spend time interviewing—often doing second, third, and even fourth rounds of interviews—and then never hear from the employer again. They’d politely inquire about the status of their application and just get silence back. Or they would make time for a phone interview—scheduled at the employer’s behest—and the call would never come. When they’d try to get in touch about rescheduling … crickets. It’s been so endemic that I’ve long advised job seekers to expect never to hear back from employers, and to simply see it as an unavoidable part of job searching.  

But now that the situation is finally reversed, oh the schadenfreude! Here’s a smattering of what workers have written to me about the turnabout:  
    Honestly I LOVE seeing potential employees treating employers the way employers have been treating their candidates for years! And then seeing the employers get all upset about it like they haven’t been behaving exactly the same way. … I really really hope that employers learn a lesson from this and start respecting job seekers a little more (although I’m not optimistic).  

    Maybe this will help employers clean up their act. Honestly, in all my years working and interviewing for jobs, I’ve only had a handful of companies get back to me after an interview. I’ve had so many just go AWOL after an interview that I thought that it was normal employer behavior, and that a company getting back to a candidate to say they were not proceeding was going the extra mile and never something to be expected.  

    If it’s unprofessional and rude to ghost someone in business communications, then why have employers been doing just this for years? It seems perfectly rational to conclude that since they have been ghosting applicants for years, therefore ghosting is normal and acceptable in business.  

    If employers wanted to be treated better, they shouldn’t have spent the last three decades treating candidates with such little humanity. You can’t treat an entire class of people like crap for decades, strip them of rights and protections, and then be upset when we don’t show enough deference to the people asking us to beg for work.  

    Given how many jobs I took the time and resources to apply to, research and show up for an interview who then never bothered to thank me for my time or let me know they filled the position, I can’t even summon up a little bit of empathy for this.  

It’s also worth noting that in many cases, the reason employers are having trouble attracting candidates who stick is because what they’re offering—in pay, benefits, hours, or other conditions of the job—simply isn’t competitive. It might have been competitive a few years ago, but it’s not in this market, and they haven’t updated their thinking to account for that:  

    I work in the public sector and we are seeing plenty of candidates disappearing. Although we have worked on pay the last few years, we are not competitive. Our governing body became very used to the job market conditions during the recession and for several years after where the employer had all the leverage. They are only now beginning to realize how the roles have reversed.  

    For example, we have been trying to fill one of our entry-level positions for the last year:  

    First go-around: no qualified applicants.  

    Second go-around: four qualified applicants, only two showed for interviews. Offered the job to both and they declined.  

    Third time’s the charm, right: We hired somebody and on their third day they didn’t show up to work. Never contacted us and wouldn’t return our calls.  

    Now we’re in the middle of try number four. We have a conditional offer but the candidate has pushed the start date back twice. We’ll see.  

It remains to be seen how long these market conditions will last. But if getting ghosted helps employers better understand what they’ve been doing to job seekers for years, that’s a good thing. And if it reflects a real shift in power toward workers, that’s even better.

* Source: slate.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------  

 Hénock Gugsa's comments ...===>  I have been down this road before and many times too!

For years, I couldn't figure out how or why I was not getting any response even as a professional courtesy.  After all, I went to great length preparing a resume, a covering letter and presented an application.  Sometimes, they required you to fill out an application form along with affidavits of one sort or another ... and you have to complete everything prior to the due date.  Alas, no dice!!!  So I developed a theory they must be throwing my application material in the wastepaper basket or shredder for one logical reason:  They could not pronounce my name, it was a foreign (an ALIEN) name and they could not handle that!  They were not even curious to meet me!

This does not mean there were not exceptions, i.e. good humans in HR departments ... and were it not for them, I wouldn't be here after decades in gainful employment and enjoying retirement!

 

Saturday, October 16, 2021

The Focus on Race ! ~ by Hénock Gugsa

 

The Focus on Race !

~ by Hénock Gugsa ~ 

It is also about: National Origin!
You may have lived here 40 years or 50 years or longer as a law-abiding, tax-paying citizen with full legal rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit  of happiness ... BUT ...

When strangers ask: "Where are you from?" ... they really mean: What are you?  
They are really not that much interested in who you are ... they're not even interested in you as a fellow human-being ! 
🤔 😕 ☹️


 

Monday, October 11, 2021

Good Normalcy ~ by Hénock Gugsa

 

 

Van Gogh - Harvest at La Grau (1888)

Good Normalcy ~ by Hénock Gugsa

{} {} {} {} {}

 I define good normalcy as the state where peace reigns, and economic stability and growth are firmly in place.

 

 

Sunday, October 3, 2021

My Take on Education~ by Hénock Gugsa

 

 My Take on Education 

~ by Hénock Gugsa ~

     My take on Education
     [Conversation in Facebook]
     ====================

     HG ===> I never liked it in school when they talked of percentiles and standard deviation bullshit when assessing where a student stood vis-à-vis his peers. Later in life, I began to appreciate the "school of life" because it made more sense to me ... like applied algebra ! 🤔 😁 😁 😁
-----------------
     FCM ===> School education is the backbone of how we will educate ourselves further down the road. It is important to evaluate pupils vs their peers, because it's a way to tell them how they perform, and also evaluate who, as an example, can go to med school.
Schooling is not perfect, but it's necessary, no bullshit there, as long as the schooling system is fact based. which goes without saying.
Hénock, I understand you because after my dad died and 6 months later our house was lost to fire, 2 weeks before I changed school, I developed a severe ADD that affect me to the point of passing from 1st in class, to 30th. I thought I was losing my mind, could not retain anything, and it took me 24 months to get back in the 1st two of the class, in Secondaire-III at Collège Bourget.
By chance I had people in the family who never lost faith in me and my potential.
But ADD stayed with me, and it prevented me from doing what I would have loved to do, becoming a physician... sad? No, not at all, because I lived a life of adventure that most don't have access to, like you and Nancy.  😉
-----------------
     NZ ===> FC: Girls and brown people were informed of their being crappy, no statistics being supplied...
I was told,
" There are no women artists. There is no female Picasso!"
I replied," Then I'll be the first!"
Fortunately, I had tons of support. My non artistic, non alcoholic parents best friends were alcoholic artists. They advised I go to the Art Students League in NYC, best advice ever!
-----------------
     FCM ===> NZ: there's nothing we can do about stupidities of the past, let',s move one and promote fact based ideas in order to prevent future slippery slopes and mind farts.
-----------------
     HG ===> FC: When we say "peers", don't we mean equals or equivalents ?  So why do we then go and evaluate them against each other?  And if we do go ahead and evaluate them, aren't we saying they're not peers?  What is the final measure of one's superiority and by whose parameters and measure ?! 🤔
-----------------
     HG ===> I don't mean to knock down educational systems in toto !  I know and appreciate their value as foundations for further learning down the road because learning never ends, curiosity never ends, and challenges never end.  However, when one considers some of the methodologies and practices of the educators, one finds  there is no consistency.  

You may find you like or understand one teacher better than another because of the way they teach the subject matter.  Some teachers prepare the lessons to be pleasurable and not onerous.  
     [ A sideline observation: I used to wonder (and I still do) why some teachers assume students know the answer to any question before it is asked?  In my mind, I'd go:  I should be the one asking the questions, and you should be the one knowing the answers.  If I knew the answers, why should I be here wasting my time ! ]
The other aspect of education is in the area of good learning material, namely text books and such !  Generally, the best of these are written by actual teachers who have interfaced with students and know their problems and concerns.  Text books by some genius with his head in the clouds can sometimes be actually dull and boring (unstimulating) ! 

Teachers have a great opportunity to counsel students because they can observe the strengths and weaknesses of each student in all areas: the specific subject matter being taught, the student's analytical and expressive talents, the student's potentials overall.  So screw the percentiles, screw the comparisons of students to their peers.  Instead, give them guidance and assurance early and often!

In my personal experience, I have known only less than a handful dedicated teachers who have bothered to go beyond the call of duty and make a life-impacting difference in any student's life !